(Click here for PDF version)
Introduction
In 1976, the FDA Food Service
Sanitation Manual (10) began to specify cooling times and temperatures,
because inadequate refrigeration processes had been identified as the major
cause of foodborne illness (2). The manual stated that: "Potentially
hazardous foods requiring refrigeration after cooking shall be rapidly
cooled to an internal temperature of 45ºF or below. --- Methods such
as shallow pans, agitation, quick chilling or water circulation external
to the food container shall be used so that the cooling period shall not
exceed 4 hours." (See §2-302 of the 1976 FDA Food Service Sanitation
Manual.) No validated research study was cited to justify the 4-hour
recommendation.
Since 1993, the FDA Food
Code has recommended that food be cooled from 140 to 70ºF in less
than 2 hours, and from 70 to 41ºF or less in 4 hours. (See §3-501-14
of the 1993, 1995, 1997, and 1999 FDA Food Codes (6, 7, 8, 9 ). The
reference for 6 hours is a 1957 research study (12), which really only
proves that Escherichia coli can grow when food cools too slowly
from 110 to 60°F, but says nothing about 140 to 41°F.
Again, no scientific research studies were referenced for the 140 to 41°F
requirement.
The FDA Food Code gives
no recommendations for precooling hot food. The code implies that
the cook should put the hot food directly into a refrigeration unit.
Many times, this hot food is at temperatures well above 140ºF when
removed from a heating device (e.g., kettle, oven, or stove top).
If hot food is immediately
put into a walk-in or reach-in refrigerator, an excessive Btu cooling load
is placed on the cooling unit. The highest growing temperature for a foodborne
pathogen (Clostridium perfringens) is 125.6ºF (13).
The question is then: "Is it really necessary to begin cooling food
directly after cooking, or can part of the cooling be done at kitchen temperatures?"
Most commercial foodservice
refrigerators are built to NSF Standard 7 (1). This standard specifies
criteria for refrigeration performance in an environment with 90ºF
air blowing through the condenser coil, but does not specify standards
for the cooling capacity of refrigeration units. When new reach-in
refrigerators are tested in the factory, the units are empty, and the door
is never opened. If the compressor is on 70% or less of the time,
and the temperature within the refrigerator does not rise above 40ºF
in a 4-hour test period, the NSF standard is met. NSF-compliant refrigerators
have no capacity and are not tested to cool food to 41ºF within 6
hours. Published research (14) has shown that a covered pan of food,
with a depth of 2 inches, requires 11 to 14 hours to cool in an NSF-compliant
refrigerator with an air temperature of 38ºF and typical air flow
of 40 to 50 feet per minute.
Walk-in refrigerators do
not work any better. These refrigeration units are not tested to
conform to NSF Standard 7. However, the compressor capacity of most
commercial walk-in units is just enough to balance the heat gain through
the walls (door never opened) and operate at 38ºF (+ or -2ºF),
which is the same performance standard as NSF Standard 7 refrigerators.
Why, then, do refrigerators
work as well as they do to cool food? The reason is that, between
approximately 10:00 PM to 8:00 AM (about 10 hours), the door is not opened,
and the compressor can reduce the air temperature within the refrigerator
to less than 40ºF. Thus, food can be cooled to, perhaps, 35°F.
The temperature of the food cannot go much below this, or the evaporator
coil of the refrigeration unit will freeze up, because the refrigerant
is operating at 15 to 20°F.
In the morning, the cold
food acts as a "heat sink," and it slowly warms, absorbing Btu's from door
openings and from hot food when it is placed in the refrigeration unit
to cool. One hundred (100) pounds of food with a nominal specific
heat of 0.75 Btu per pound, warming from 35 to 40ºF, will absorb 375
Btu's of heat. This might cool about 2 pounds of food from 190 to
40ºF (150ºF). This cycling of food temperatures from cold
at night to warm during the day is very detrimental to food quality, as
well as being inefficient. The growth rate of spoilage microorganisms
is about one generation every 15 hours at 35ºF, and one generation
every 5.5 hours at 45ºF. So, 45ºF at 8:00 PM is not dangerous
if the food was at 35ºF for 10 hours at night. The slow and
fast growth rates balance out.
Maintenance of temperature and energy conservation
Bryan et al. (3) reported
the following example of the effect of warm food on refrigeration temperature:
"After cooking, turkeys were deboned and the still-warm meat and stock
were put into the reach-in refrigerator. The refrigerator air temperature
rose from 34ºF to more than 90ºF and remained above 50ºF
for 10 hours." If restaurants do not have to put hot food directly
into refrigeration units to meet regulatory requirements, the cold air
temperatures of these units can be maintained at a more uniform, low temperature
of 45ºF. If refrigerators were allowed to operate at 45ºF
vs. 40ºF, there would be an expected power savings of 39% per refrigeration
unit (5).
Allowing food to cool at
room temperature before it is placed in a refrigeration unit will also
conserve energy by decreasing the Btu cooling load on refrigeration units.
For example, to cool 1 pound of food with a specific heat of 0.75 Btu /
lb. from 190 to 90ºF requires 75 Btu's. To cool the food from
90 to 40ºF requires 37.5 Btu's. Therefore, if the food were
to cool to 90ºF before it was placed in a refrigeration unit, there
would be a Btu saving of 100%.
Is there a microbiological hazard?
What is the microbiological
hazard from cooling hot food in the kitchen, prior to putting it into the
refrigerator? Juneja et al. (11) showed that continuous cooling of
cooked hamburger from 130 to 45ºF in 15 hours allows about 1 log of
multiplication of Clostridium perfringens. This study is now
used as the performance standard for safe food cooling by the USDA (4).
This is a 15-hour continuous cooling period for cooling food from 130 to
45ºF with a 38ºF driving force (refrigeration air temperature).
In this cooling, 2 ½ hours is required to decrease the temperature
of the food from 130 to 93ºF. If food can be cooled at this
rate at kitchen temperatures, it will be safe.
Experimental procedure
The experiment was conducted
in a commercial restaurant kitchen. The kitchen air temperature (cooling
driving force) ranged from 60ºF when the experiment started at 8:00
AM to about 83ºF when the kitchen heated up by noon.
A simulated sauce was prepared
by bringing water to a boil and stirring in a slurry of water and flour
to the hot water to achieve a final concentration of 7% by weight flour
to water. After heating, the mock sauce was filled 2 inches deep
in 12"x 20"x 2 1/2" pans. In order to measure the temperature decline
in the sauce as it cooled, a 30-gauge chromal-aluminal thermocouple
was fastened 1 inch from the bottom of a 1/8-inch-diameter polypropylene
rod. The rod was then placed vertically into the pan with the tip
resting on the bottom of the pan. With this arrangement, the geometric
center temperature in the middle of the 2-inch deep simulated sauce could
be accurately measured with a Model 50 Electronic Controls and Design 5-thermocouple-channel
data logger (ECD, Beaverton, OR). See Figure
2.
Two methods of cooling at
kitchen temperature were measured. One method utilized a $15.00,
20-inch, box floor fan from a discount store. The fan was placed
on the side of the rack holding the pan of food and blew kitchen air across
the food at about 1,000 feet per minute (Figure 3).
For the second method of cooling, the fan was not used (Figure
4). For both methods, the pans of mock sauce rested on 1-pint,
plastic inserts so that there was no restriction of air flow across the
bottom of the pans. Cooling research (15) has shown that about 75%
of the heat is extracted from the bottom of the pan, rather than the covered
top of the pan. Therefore, there must be free airflow across the
bottom of the pan.
Results and Discussion
Comparison of product cooling
is shown by the data in Tables 1 and 2.
The surrounding kitchen air temperature for the simulated sauce cooled
in the presence of a fan ranged from a starting temperature of 60°F
at 8:00 AM to 83°F at noon. A graph of the cooling processes
is shown in Figure 1.
With no fan, the sauce cooled
from 130 to 93°F in about 5 3/4 hours. With a fan, the center
temperature of the sauce cooled from 130 to 93°F in about 1 hour.
Juneja et al. (11) showed
in this study to determine safe cooling of food, that cooked hamburger,
inoculated with spores of C. perfringens, cooled continuously from
130 to 45°F in 15 hours was safe. In this study, the time to
go from 130 to 93°F was 2 1/2 hours. (See Figure
1.) Obviously, fan cooling of hot food to 10°F above kitchen
temperature is safe.
Conclusion
This experiment shows that
hot food can be cooled safely in a commercial kitchen at 83°F if a
simple floor fan is used to blow air across the pans of covered food.
A simple way to do this is to mount fans to the side of a rack and load
the rack with hot food. The hazard is the spores of C. perfringens
that
survive cooking. This hazard is controlled by the rapid cooling between
130 and 93°F. The control point is monitored with a tip-sensitive
digital thermistor thermometer, positioned in the middle of the food.
The cook reads the thermometer 2 times, about 1 hour apart, and if the
slope of the line is faster than that shown on Figure 1
for Juneja Safe Cooling, the cooling is safe.
There is no scientific reason
for placing hot food in a refrigeration unit immediately after it has been
removed from the heat source. Allowing covered hot food to cool in
front of a fan in a kitchen is safe. When the food gets to about 90°F,
it should be placed in the refrigeration unit to finish cooling.
This procedure has the potential for saving millions of Btu's of refrigeration
energy that is currently wasted in food operations to cool hot food above,
for example 90°F, without any risk. Inexpensive digital thermometers
can now be programmed to sound when a temperature of 90°F is reached
in the food. If this type of a thermometer is used, the cook will
not forget to put the food in the refrigerator. If the cook were
to do the process once with fans and 2-inch pans of food and qualify the
process as safe, the temperature of the food does not have to be monitored.
The hazard control is monitored simply by verifying that the fans are on
and the food is 2 inches deep or less in the pan. The bimetallic
coil thermometer cannot be used to monitor this procedure, because it is
not tip sensitive.
References:
1. American National Standard / National
Sanitation Foundation International. Standard 7. 1999.
Commercial Refrigerators and Storage Freezers. NSF International.
Ann Arbor, MI.
2. Bryan, F.L. 1974. Microbiological
food hazards today - Based on epidemiological information. Food Tech.
34(9): 52-66.
3. Bryan, F.L., McKinley, T.W., and
Mixon, B. 1971. Use of time-temperature evaluations in detecting
the responsible vehicle and contributing factors of foodborne disease outbreaks.
J. Milk Food Tech. 34(12): 579-582.
4. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
1995. Title 9. Animal and Animal Products. Part 200 to
end. Superintendent of Documents. U.S. Government Printing
Office. Washington, D.C.
5. Faramarzi, P.E. and Woodworth, M.
1997 Colder temperatures in display cases. ASHRAE J.
39(12): 35-39
6. FDA Food Code. 1993.
U.S. Public Health Service, U.S. Dept. of Commerce. Technology Administration,
National Technical Information Service. Pub. No. PB94-113941AS.
Springfield, VA.
7. FDA Food Code. 1995.
U.S. Public Health Service, U.S. Dept. of Commerce. Technology Administration,
National Technical Information Service. Pub. No. PB95-265492CEH.
Springfield, VA.
8. FDA Food Code. 1997.
U.S. Public Health Service, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services.
Pub. No. PB97-141204. Washington, D.C.
9. FDA. 1999. Food Code.
U.S. Public Health Service, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services.
Pub. No. PB99-115925. Washington, D.C.
10. FDA Food Service Sanitation Manual.
1976. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Public
Health Service. Division of Retail Food Protection. Washington,
D.C.
11. Juneja, V.K., Snyder, O.P., and
Cygnarowicz-Provost, M. 1994. Influence of cooling rate on
outgrowth of Clostridium perfringens spores in cooked ground beef.
J. Food Prot. 57(12): 1063-1067.
12. Longree, K. and White, J. C. 1955.
Cooling rates and bacterial growth in food prepared and stored in quantity.
J. Am. Dietetic Assoc. 3 1: 124-132.
13. Shoemaker, S.P., and Pierson, M.
D. 1976. "Phoenix Phenomenon" in the growth of Clostridiium perfringerns.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 32(6): 803-807.
14. Snyder, O.P. 1997. Two-inch
and four-inch food cooling in a commercial walk-in refrigerator.
Dairy Food Environ. Sanitation. 17(7): 398-404.
15. Snyder, O.P. 1992. Chap.
3. Effect of air flow and evaporation on cooling food in a 2-inch
pan. in Food Safety Through Quality Assurance Management. Hospitality
Inst. of Technol. & Mgmt. St. Paul, MN. p. 11.
|
|
|
|
Difference (F) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference (F) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 2.
2-1/2-inch stainless steel pan with 2-inch,
flour-thickened
water rigged for cooling